This is something that I have been considering for a while, and it isn't really covered in the many many discussions about AI:
There are just so many jobs that AI can't replace. Last week, I had to move a lot of furniture out of my house. I spent $300 so two men could load a couch, a chair, and a large table, along with other things, into the back of a truck, and then take it to the dump. This took some time, the table had to be dismantled, etc.
This is a job that, as far as I know, AI can't do!
There are a lot of jobs that require manual labor, but also involve a lot of decision making. In fact, that is what most jobs involve! Whether it is drawing blood, serving coffee, trimming a tree, moving boxes, mopping a floor, shelving books, fixing a roof, surveying a field or judging the value of collectibles, there are so many tasks that AI is almost totally irrelevant for. Sometimes it could provide some automation, but human judgment is still necessary. Or, you know, human hands.
The reason I don't think this occurs to many people in business who are fueling the AI bubble is that most of them have only had office jobs for a long time. When you work in an office, sorting through information and then restating it all day, that seems like what "Real Work" is, and so you think that AI is this gigantic breakthrough, because you can scan an email and then send a summary of that email to someone else, who will then automatically repost that information in another report, that someone else will then refine and email...and that is "Real Work". And all of these people honestly think that any job that requires interacting with the real world is stupid and frivolous.