glowingfish (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
glowingfish) wrote2025-01-07 11:39 am
glowingfish) wrote2025-01-07 11:39 am
The basics of life in Costa Rica
I should probably mention a few things about Costa Rica!
The first thing is that Costa Rica is a "middle income country", at least that is what I would call it.
But what does that mean?
Basically, for me, it means that I don't see a lot of extreme poverty, but that things are a little bit more cracked/jury-rigged than I am usually used to. But also, some of that is cultural.
There are a few "shantytowns" or "precarios" in Costa Rica, places built out of spare lumber and tin, but they are less common than homeless camps are in the United States, from what I have seen. There is also not anything like a problem with obvious malnutrition (and any malnutrition that does occur is probably due to fast food/junk food). There is also probably close to 100% literacy. There are schools and medical clinics everywhere.
The big difference that I've noticed is that a lot of the infrastructure is older. Bus lines, of which there are many, sometimes use old American school buses. Sidewalks disappear. Traffic has to alternative over one lane bridges. San Jose's passenger train network is based on a century year old freight railroad.
Some of the difference is cultural. I especially notice this with transportation: there aren't routes or schedules for the buses. The buses aren't operated by a central transit agency. If you want to figure out where to go, you just have to kind of...know. But this isn't due to a lack of technology or money, at least sometimes. I walked into a small grocery store in a little mountain town, and the cashier had a 30 inch flat panel monitor for her register. But the train stations don't even have a dot matrix display for arrival or departure time of trains. Part of the jury-rigging of infrastructure just seems to be a cultural thing.
The first thing is that Costa Rica is a "middle income country", at least that is what I would call it.
But what does that mean?
Basically, for me, it means that I don't see a lot of extreme poverty, but that things are a little bit more cracked/jury-rigged than I am usually used to. But also, some of that is cultural.
There are a few "shantytowns" or "precarios" in Costa Rica, places built out of spare lumber and tin, but they are less common than homeless camps are in the United States, from what I have seen. There is also not anything like a problem with obvious malnutrition (and any malnutrition that does occur is probably due to fast food/junk food). There is also probably close to 100% literacy. There are schools and medical clinics everywhere.
The big difference that I've noticed is that a lot of the infrastructure is older. Bus lines, of which there are many, sometimes use old American school buses. Sidewalks disappear. Traffic has to alternative over one lane bridges. San Jose's passenger train network is based on a century year old freight railroad.
Some of the difference is cultural. I especially notice this with transportation: there aren't routes or schedules for the buses. The buses aren't operated by a central transit agency. If you want to figure out where to go, you just have to kind of...know. But this isn't due to a lack of technology or money, at least sometimes. I walked into a small grocery store in a little mountain town, and the cashier had a 30 inch flat panel monitor for her register. But the train stations don't even have a dot matrix display for arrival or departure time of trains. Part of the jury-rigging of infrastructure just seems to be a cultural thing.
no subject
One of the reasons that "socialism" isn't popular in the United States is that...socialism is so successful, people don't realize things are socialized. "
In the United States, there are about 500 airports with scheduled passenger flights. Of those, about 1 is privately operated.
But in the US, people don't usually think of government owned airports as "socialism", they just think of it as an obvious fact of life.
no subject
We'd generally draw a distinction here between socialism and socialised, I think, except that we don't use the latter much. One of the most common tell-tales of an American on Twitter pretending to be British is if they start referring to the NHS as "socialised medicine". That term is virtually never used by actual British people.